|
| Ecdysozoa Fossil range: Early Cambrian - Recent | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | ||||||||
| Scientific classification | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| Phyla | ||||||||
The Ecdysozoa are a group of protostome animals, including the Arthropoda (insects, arachnids, crustaceans, et cetera), Nematoda, and several smaller phyla. They were first defined by Aguinaldo et al. in 1997, based mainly on trees constructed using 18S ribosomal RNA genes.Aguinaldo, A. M. A., J. M. Turbeville, L. S. Linford, M. C. Rivera, J. R. Garey, R. A. Raff, & J. A. Lake, 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387: 489-493. The group is also supported by morphological characters, and can be considered as including all animals that shed their exoskeleton (see ecdysis). Groups corresponding roughly to the Ecdysozoa had been proposed previously by Perrier in 1897 and Seurat in 1920 based on morphology alone.
The most notable characteristic shared by ecdysozoans is a three-layered cuticle composed of organic material, which is periodically molted as the animal grows. This process is called ecdysis and gives the group its name. The Ecdysozoans lack locomotory cilia, produce mostly amoeboid sperm, and their embryos do not undergo spiral cleavage as in most other protostomes. Various other features are found in the group — for instance, both tardigrades, pycnogonids and roundworms have a triradiate pharynx.
The Ecdysozoa include the following phyla: Arthropoda, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Kinorhyncha, Priapulida, Loricifera, Nematoda and Nematomorpha. A few other groups, such as the gastrotrichs, have been considered possible members but lack the main characters of the group, and are now placed elsewhere. The Arthropoda, Onychophora and Tardigrada have been grouped together as the Panarthropoda because they are distinguished by segmented body plans.Paleos Invertebrates: Panarthropoda - URL retrieved February 17, 2007
The non-panarthropod members of Ecdysozoa have been grouped as Cycloneuralia but they are more usually considered paraphyletic.
The grouping proposed by Aguinaldo et al. is not universally accepted. Some zoologists still hold to the view that Panarthropoda should be classified with Annelida and that Ecdysozoa are polyphyletic. Especially the highly derived roundworms, with their many parasitic taxa and a considerable number of autapomorphies continue to pose problems.
One of the proposed solutions is to regard Ecdysozoa as a sister-group of Annelida,Nielsen, C. (2003) Proposing a solution to the Articulata–Ecdysozoa controversy. Zoologica Scripta 32:5, 475-482 however the controversy is still far from closure.Jenner, Ronald A. Unleashing the force of cladistics? Metazoan phylogenetics and hypothesis testing. Integrative and Comparative Biology, Feb 2003
A partial phylogenetic tree of the Ecdysozoa hypothesis is as follows.Tree of Life web project - Bilateria - accessed January 8 2007
| |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Wikispecies has information related to:
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia